Conservation-Litigation.org update: the cacti finally have their day in court
In 2021, Maribel and I read a curious article in the New York Times by Rachel Nuwer: A massive seizure of illegal cacti had been poached from Chile's Atacama Desert, and smuggled to Italy for sale to fanatical gardeners around the world.
That story led us down a wild path, and to court in a picturesque Italian seaside town…
Rachel’s article led us to the IUCN’s Cactus and Succulent Specialist Group, the global experts on everything cactus. Chair, Dr. Barbara Goettsch, shared the story of how an international team had worked to repatriate the seized plants to their native Chile.
She also introduced us to Andrea Cattabriga, a passionate advocate for sustainable cactus collecting and conservation. He founded L’Associazione per la Biodiversità e la sua Conservazione (ABC), a group dedicated to cactus conservation that was key to uncovering the case, supporting the Ancona Carabinieri in their identification and handling of the plants. He later worked with Barbara and botanical gardens in Chile and Italy to help to rescue and return the plants.
ABC is now bringing a unique case – speaking for the cacti in court.
The Association is supported by Conservation-Litigation.org and a pro bono team from the law firm DLA Piper, coordinated by Raffaella Quintana and involving Federico Lucariello, Ornella Belfiori, Francesca Cannata, Maria Chiara Panichi and Matteo Nicolì.
Serious about the case, Ancona's Carabinieri and Prosecutor brought criminal charges against the illegal traders in December 2023. We have supported ABC to join this legal action as a civil party. ABC is bringing a civil claim against the traders for harming its mission: “to promote concrete actions for the protection of biodiversity, everywhere in the world."
The Ancona court recently recognised ABC's right to speak for nature. This has a wide historical and legal significance: Groups like ABC have a right to take part in criminal proceedings related to offences that harm their missions. It confirms that conservation groups can help give a powerful legal voice to nature’s rights.
If successful, the defendants will have to compensate ABC for the harm to its mission – funds that will be used to protect the repatriated plants and support conservation of protected cactus species threatened by illegal trade.
Regardless of the final outcome of the proceedings, the Court’s admission of ABC as a civil party in this case has a wider historical and legal significance: although allowed under Italian law, this recognition was not a foregone result as case law has not been consistent. This case confirms that groups like ABC have a right to take part in criminal proceedings related to offences that could harm their missions.
The case highlights that tackling environmental crimes is not just about investing and enforcement, but about creating accountability and securing remedies for harm to nature. That is why we founded Conservation-Litigation.org.
Please help to share this important case, whether on Twitter, LinkedIn, or our Press Release with your colleagues.